The eXcellent Football Bowl Subdivision
An online NCAA-style football league using FBPRO'98.

Weighted Conference Power Rankings (WCPR)

After week 12

RK Prv TEAM W L W/L% Conf
W
Conf
L
Conf Games Played Conf W/L% ConfAVG WCPR
SCORE
1 3 Iowa 10 2 0.833 7 2 9 0.778 0.523 0.7141
2 1 Oregon 9 3 0.750 8 1 9 0.889 0.475 0.7121
3 4 Michigan State 9 3 0.750 7 2 9 0.778 0.523 0.6875
4 2 Purdue 8 4 0.667 7 2 9 0.778 0.523 0.6608
5 6 Florida State 8 4 0.667 7 2 9 0.778 0.498 0.6528
6 9 Boise State 8 4 0.667 6 3 9 0.667 0.475 0.6055
7 5 Notre Dame 7 5 0.583 6 3 9 0.667 0.523 0.5941
8 10 Louisiana State 7 5 0.583 6 3 9 0.667 0.498 0.5862
8 10 Virginia Tech 7 5 0.583 6 3 9 0.667 0.498 0.5862
10 7 Stanford 7 5 0.583 6 3 9 0.667 0.475 0.5788
10 12 Washington 7 5 0.583 6 3 9 0.667 0.475 0.5788
12 8 Arkansas 8 4 0.667 5 4 9 0.556 0.498 0.5728
13 14 USC 8 4 0.667 5 4 9 0.556 0.475 0.5655
14 16 Ohio State 7 5 0.583 5 4 9 0.556 0.523 0.5541
15 12 Oklahoma State 6 6 0.500 5 4 9 0.556 0.475 0.5121
16 15 Alabama 5 7 0.417 5 4 9 0.556 0.498 0.4928
16 20 Tennessee 5 7 0.417 5 4 9 0.556 0.498 0.4928
18 17 Miami 6 6 0.500 4 5 9 0.444 0.498 0.4795
19 21 Oklahoma 6 6 0.500 4 5 9 0.444 0.475 0.4721
20 18 Wisconsin 6 6 0.500 3 6 9 0.333 0.523 0.4475
21 19 Texas AM 6 6 0.500 3 6 9 0.333 0.498 0.4395
22 22 Nebraska 5 7 0.417 3 6 9 0.333 0.523 0.4208
23 24 Iowa State 4 8 0.333 3 6 9 0.333 0.523 0.3941
24 27 West Virginia 4 8 0.333 3 6 9 0.333 0.475 0.3788
25 28 Florida 5 7 0.417 2 7 9 0.222 0.498 0.3728
26 22 Houston 4 8 0.333 2 7 9 0.222 0.523 0.3541
27 24 Michigan 3 9 0.250 2 7 9 0.222 0.523 0.3275
28 26 Georgia 3 9 0.250 2 7 9 0.222 0.498 0.3195
29 29 UCLA 2 10 0.167 2 7 9 0.222 0.475 0.2855
30 30 Texas 0 12 0.000 0 9 9 0.000 0.475 0.1521

 

RK Prv CONFERENCE W L ConfW/L % ConfCRPI ConfAVG
1 1 Central SubDivision 63 57 0.525 0.522 0.523
2 2 Eastern SubDivision 60 60 0.500 0.497 0.498
3 3 Western SubDivision 57 63 0.475 0.476 0.475

 

This poll is based on the average of your W/L %, your conference W/L % and the combined average of your conference’s CRPI % and W/L%. This poll gives you credit for doing well in your conference, but weighs that against your overall record and the strength of your conference compared to other conferences. The team with the highest final score gets 1.000 and the rest of the teams divide their final score by the final score of the team with the highest score to determine their component %. The great thing about this poll is that it encourages conference rivalries and rewards teams for being the best in their conference. Teams that struggle against conference opponents could potentially end up hurting 1/3rd of their BCS ranking. If teams are tied because they have the same power score, a head to head tiebreaker is applied as follows: 1) If two teams have the same amount of power points and they played each other, then the team that won will be ranked ahead of the team that lost. 2) If more than two teams have the same amount of power points but only two played each other, then the team that won will be ranked ahead of the team that lost, but will still be ranked equal to the other team. The team that lost the H2H match-up will be ranked only one spot below the other two teams. 3) If two or more teams have the same amount of power points and they did not play each other, the teams with more wins will be ranked higher than the pther teams. 4) Additonal tie breakers are overall W/L%, then conference W/L%, and then conference CRPI %.