The eXcellent Football Bowl Subdivision
An online NCAA-style football league using FBPRO'98.

Weighted Conference Power Rankings (WCPR)

After week 12

RK Prv TEAM W L W/L% Conf
W
Conf
L
Conf W/L% ConfAVG WCPR
SCORE

Tiebreaks
1 1 Purdue 11 1 0.917 8 1 0.889 0.492 0.7708 N/A
2 2 Oregon 10 2 0.833 8 1 0.889 0.507 0.7491 W-USC
3 3 USC 10 2 0.833 8 1 0.889 0.507 0.7491 L-UO
4 4 Miami 10 2 0.833 8 1 0.889 0.492 0.7442 N/A
5 6 Tennessee 9 3 0.750 7 2 0.778 0.499 0.6797 N/A
6 9 Florida State 8 4 0.667 7 2 0.778 0.499 0.6530 N/A
7 8 Oklahoma 9 3 0.750 6 3 0.667 0.507 0.6424 N/A
8 5 Iowa 9 3 0.750 6 3 0.667 0.492 0.6375 N/A
9 7 Virginia Tech 8 4 0.667 6 3 0.667 0.499 0.6130 N/A
10 10 Houston 7 5 0.583 6 3 0.667 0.492 0.5842 N/A
11 15 Michigan 7 5 0.583 5 4 0.556 0.492 0.5442 N/A
12 12 Arkansas 6 6 0.500 5 4 0.556 0.492 0.5175 W-MSU
13 19 Michigan State 6 6 0.500 5 4 0.556 0.492 0.5175 L-ARK
14 11 Oklahoma State 7 5 0.583 4 5 0.444 0.507 0.5091 N/A
15 20 Arizona 5 7 0.417 5 4 0.556 0.507 0.4957 N/A
16 18 Alabama 6 6 0.500 4 5 0.444 0.499 0.4797 N/A
17 13 Arizona State 5 7 0.417 4 5 0.444 0.507 0.4557 W-BSU
18 16 Boise State 5 7 0.417 4 5 0.444 0.507 0.4557 L-ASU
19 14 Texas 6 6 0.500 3 6 0.333 0.507 0.4424 N/A
20 17 West Virginia 5 7 0.417 3 6 0.333 0.499 0.4130 N/A
21 22 Auburn 4 8 0.333 3 6 0.333 0.499 0.3863 W-NCST
22 23 NC State 4 8 0.333 3 6 0.333 0.499 0.3863 L-AUB
23 24 Notre Dame 4 8 0.333 3 6 0.333 0.492 0.3842 N/A
24 21 Ohio State 4 8 0.333 3 6 0.333 0.492 0.3842 N/A
25 26 Wisconsin 4 8 0.333 3 6 0.333 0.492 0.3842 N/A
26 27 North Carolina 3 9 0.250 2 7 0.222 0.499 0.3197 W-UF
27 25 Florida 3 9 0.250 2 7 0.222 0.499 0.3197 L-UNC
28 29 Brigham Young 2 10 0.167 2 7 0.222 0.507 0.2957 N/A
29 28 UCLA 2 10 0.167 1 8 0.111 0.507 0.2557 N/A
30 30 Nebraska 1 11 0.083 1 8 0.111 0.492 0.2242 N/A

 

Conference W/L%          
RK Prv CONFERENCE W L ConfW/L % ConfCRPI ConfAVG
1 1 Western SubDivision 61 59 0.508 0.507 0.507
2 2 Eastern SubDivision 60 60 0.500 0.498 0.499
3 3 Central SubDivision 59 61 0.492 0.493 0.492

 

Western SubDivision           vs Conf  
Team W L T PF PA W L T OppW-Cf
zy Oregon 10 2 0 457 211 8 1 0 45
y USC 10 2 0 437 352 8 1 0 41
x Oklahoma 9 3 0 346 282 6 3 0 27
Oklahoma State 7 5 0 343 325 4 5 0 15
Texas 6 6 0 250 252 3 6 0 17
Arizona 5 7 0 308 305 5 4 0 29
Arizona State 5 7 0 234 226 4 5 0 15
Boise State 5 7 0 297 270 4 5 0 16
Brigham Young 2 10 0 150 280 2 7 0 8
UCLA 2 10 0 208 357 1 8 0 5
                   
Central SubDivision           vs Conf  
Team W L T PF PA W L T OppW-Cf
zy Purdue 11 1 0 376 235 8 1 0 47
x Iowa 9 3 0 325 221 6 3 0 29
x Houston 7 5 0 337 319 6 3 0 28
x Michigan 7 5 0 291 252 5 4 0 19
Arkansas 6 6 0 292 265 5 4 0 22
x Michigan State 6 6 0 328 274 5 4 0 22
Notre Dame 4 8 0 249 355 3 6 0 14
Wisconsin 4 8 0 177 222 3 6 0 12
Ohio State 4 8 0 277 335 3 6 0 11
Nebraska 1 11 0 178 450 1 8 0 11
               
Eastern SubDivision           vs Conf  
Team W L T PF PA W L T OppW-Cf
zy Miami 10 2 0 326 236 8 1 0 46
x Tennessee 9 3 0 299 233 7 2 0 33
x Florida State 8 4 0 265 246 7 2 0 34
x Virginia Tech 8 4 0 247 196 6 3 0 29
Alabama 6 6 0 222 262 4 5 0 14
West Virginia 5 7 0 176 205 3 6 0 13
Auburn 4 8 0 309 317 3 6 0 15
NC State 4 8 0 246 343 3 6 0 18
Florida 3 9 0 286 375 2 7 0 9
North Carolina 3 9 0 225 260 2 7 0 7

 

z=conference champ

y=bye week

x=1st round

 

This poll is based on the average of your W/L %, your conference W/L % and the combined average of your conference’s CRPI % and W/L%. This poll gives you credit for doing well in your conference, but weighs that against your overall record and the strength of your conference compared to other conferences. The team with the highest final score gets 1.000 and the rest of the teams divide their final score by the final score of the team with the highest score to determine their component %. The great thing about this poll is that it encourages conference rivalries and rewards teams for being the best in their conference. Teams that struggle against conference opponents could potentially end up hurting 1/3rd of their BCS ranking. If teams are tied because they have the same power score, a head to head tiebreaker is applied as follows: 1) If two teams have the same amount of power points and they played each other, then the team that won will be ranked ahead of the team that lost. 2) If more than two teams have the same amount of power points but only two played each other, then the team that won will be ranked ahead of the team that lost, but will still be ranked equal to the other team. The team that lost the H2H match-up will be ranked only one spot below the other two teams. 3) If two or more teams have the same amount of power points and they did not play each other, the teams with more wins will be ranked higher than the pther teams. 4) Additonal tie breakers are overall W/L%, then conference W/L%, and then conference CRPI %.